In the wake of Chief MKO Abiola's sudden passing during a meeting with US envoys, former Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, has stepped forward to offer a compelling narrative that challenges the notion of poisoning. In his autobiography, 'Call of Duty', Abubakar provides a detailed account, asserting that an autopsy conducted by an international team of pathologists attributed Abiola's death to natural causes. This revelation not only sheds light on the circumstances surrounding Abiola's demise but also prompts a deeper exploration of the political landscape of Nigeria during that tumultuous era.
Abubakar's narrative paints a picture of a man grappling with pre-existing medical conditions, including hypertension and heart ailments, which had been a known concern since 1994 when Abiola was first detained. The former Head of State emphasizes the public knowledge of Abiola's health struggles, suggesting that his death was a tragic yet natural occurrence. The autopsy, involving American, British, Nigerian, and Canadian pathologists, provides a compelling scientific validation of this claim, dispelling any notions of foul play.
What makes this account particularly intriguing is the detailed account of the fatal meeting with the American delegation. Susan Rice's memoir offers a firsthand account of Abiola's deteriorating health, noting his mild coughing fits that escalated into a 'wracking' cough. The description of Abiola's distress, including his swollen ankles and difficulty breathing, paints a vivid picture of a man in the throes of a medical emergency. The swift response of the medical team, including the arrival of a doctor within 10 minutes, further supports the notion that Abiola's death was a tragic yet natural occurrence.
However, the political implications of Abiola's death cannot be overlooked. The timing of his passing, just over a month after the death of General Sani Abacha, has fueled speculation about a potential conspiracy to prevent Abiola's release and inauguration. The narrative of a man in custody, with a delegation of foreign officials present, raises questions about the circumstances surrounding his death. The suggestion that Abiola's death was not a natural occurrence but a carefully orchestrated event is a compelling, yet controversial, interpretation of the events.
Abubakar's response to these allegations is a powerful statement of his integrity. He vehemently denies receiving any substantial sums of money, describing the claim as 'pure fantasy' and 'an absolute imagination'. This assertion not only protects his reputation but also underscores the importance of transparency in political affairs. The former Head of State's insistence on the truth, even in the face of speculation, is a testament to his commitment to integrity and accountability.
In conclusion, the autopsy report and the detailed account provided by Abubakar offer a compelling narrative that challenges the notion of poisoning. While the political implications of Abiola's death cannot be ignored, the scientific evidence and the former Head of State's unwavering commitment to truth provide a compelling alternative interpretation. The story of MKO Abiola's death serves as a reminder of the complexities of the Nigerian political landscape and the enduring quest for truth and justice.
